Readify

Niccoluccio Caccianimico

The Decameron

Niccoluccio Caccianimico is Madam Catalina’s husband in a story where apparent death, mistaken identity, and an unexpected reunion test what a person owes to another. His part turns on a striking reversal: he argues that a man who rescues an abandoned servant may justly keep him, not knowing that Messer Gentile de' Carisendi has rescued his own wife. Gentile uses the argument not to claim Madam Catalina, but to reveal her and their infant son, then freely return them to Niccoluccio.

Identity and Place in the Story

Niccoluccio Caccianimico is a gentleman of Bologna and the husband of Madam Catalina. When the story begins, he is away from the city. His absence leaves Madam Catalina at a country house about three miles from Bologna while she is pregnant. There she suffers a sudden and violent illness that extinguishes every outward sign of life. Several physicians judge her dead, and, after her female relatives conclude that her pregnancy is not sufficiently advanced for the child to be fully formed, she is buried in a vault in a nearby church.

The story does not make Niccoluccio a participant in the mistaken burial or the rescue. Instead, it holds him apart from those events until the moment of recognition: he believes Madam Catalina dead and has no reason to expect that the woman brought into Gentile’s hall is his wife. His position as an absent husband makes the later encounter depend on what he cannot know, even as the audience has been told how she survived.

The Apparent Death and Rescue

While Niccoluccio is absent, Messer Gentile de' Carisendi is serving as provost of Modena. He had loved Madam Catalina, but his love was not returned, and he had gone to Modena in despair. After hearing of her burial, Gentile has her body secretly taken from the tomb and brought to his house. There he discovers that she is still alive, though unable to speak or move. His household cares for her, and she gradually recovers.

Madam Catalina gives birth to a son in Gentile’s house. She remains there for nearly three months, living with Gentile’s mother; Gentile later stresses that she has behaved as chastely there as she would have in her parents’ or husband’s home. Niccoluccio does not know that his wife and child have survived. Their continued separation is therefore not a chosen estrangement but the consequence of a death believed by their families and confirmed by physicians.

The Banquet and Niccoluccio’s Judgment

When Gentile returns to Bologna, he hosts a banquet and invites Niccoluccio Caccianimico among the guests. Before bringing Madam Catalina into the hall, Gentile poses a question about a servant: if a master abandons a gravely ill servant in the street and a stranger takes him in, pays for his care, and restores him to health, does the first master have a right to demand him back? After discussion, the company asks Niccoluccio, as an eloquent speaker, to give the answer.

Niccoluccio reasons that the first master has forfeited his claim by abandoning the servant, while the person who has cared for him may justly keep him. The other guests agree, and Gentile says that he shares their opinion. The exchange establishes a principle of obligation through action: a claim rooted in prior possession can be weakened or lost through neglect, while care can create a legitimate bond. Niccoluccio delivers this judgment without knowing that Gentile is about to present a case that seems to resemble it.

Gentile then summons Madam Catalina, magnificently dressed, and she enters carrying her handsome little son. The guests honor her and look at her closely; some say she seems to be the woman they once knew, but believed dead. Niccoluccio gazes at her especially intently and asks whether she is a woman from Bologna or a stranger. He does not recognize his wife. Madam Catalina nearly answers, but keeps silent in accordance with the arrangement Gentile has made. Other guests ask who she is and whose child she carries; she answers none of them.

Recognition, Return, and Significance

With Niccoluccio and the others still waiting, Gentile at last tells the story of the woman’s rescue. He identifies the little boy as Niccoluccio’s son, explains that he held him at baptism and named him Gentile, and places the child and his mother in Niccoluccio’s arms. Gentile also absolves Madam Catalina of any promise she had made him and leaves her free to return to her husband. Niccoluccio receives them eagerly, all the more joyful because he had ceased to hope for their return.

The reunion resolves the apparent contradiction between Niccoluccio’s banquet judgment and Gentile’s conduct. Gentile has invoked the logic of rescue and care, yet he does not treat Madam Catalina as property to be retained. Instead, he recognizes her marriage and returns both mother and child, affirming that his love was the occasion of her deliverance rather than a warrant to possess her. The story reports that the Bolognese watched Madam Catalina with lasting amazement, as though she had risen from the dead, and that Messer Gentile remained a friend to Niccoluccio and to both families. Niccoluccio’s role is thus defined less by an independent pursuit than by the change from bereaved husband to restored husband and father, and by his unwitting contribution to the story’s reflection on care, rightful claims, and generous renunciation.